Political movements being staged in Myanmar can be identified as non-rational acts. In fact, General Aung San, since his young Thakin life, had expressed definitions of political outlook, political doctrine and rationality on cause and effect as well as the good and the bad.
During the struggling independence period, General Aung San criticized that the ministers at that time didn’t have the experience to perform administration effectively, setting aside good or bad governance. He had met with the education minister. Attempts to be self-famous and wealthy were not politics. Conscience to develop the country was politics. He did not rationalize what the State’s future was and how to walk along the paradise on earth to keep the State away from poverty. The doctrine was based on rationality, he added.
The General pointed out that politics and doctrine were inseparable, and doctrine had to be upheld. He said the emergence of doctrine depended on era, region and situation. He highlighted governing the country without doctrine at that time. If principles were the same, political isms would not differ from each other. Although they held dialogues on unity, it was not genuine unity. It was not good for the country. The General noticed that non-existence of such unity was better than existence.
Cause and effect are interrelated. Myanmar people generally say knowledge and education are separate. If anyone does not know the difference between the flow of history and the root cause of history, it will not be beneficial to learning history. They would not have the capability to solve the problems of society.
Those who served the State interests could not foster genuine unity. They uncertainly governed the country. Without the implementation of genuine political doctrine, they prioritized grasping the State power for their self-interests only. They paved the way heading for hell to the people without the ability to rationalize the future. Dishonesty to the State interests was derailed by confrontation.
That is why it is necessary to uphold concepts for accepting a common political doctrine for the sake of the nation and striving to possess the capability to rationalize cause and effect concerning the interests of the State and the people.
That is why it is necessary to uphold concepts for accepting a common political doctrine for the sake of the nation and striving to possess the capability to rationalize cause and effect concerning the interests of the State and the people.
